Winery Owners Seek Repeal of Live Music Ban on South Main

Little Hills Winery and Restaurant owners have asked the city to consider changing the zoning codes to allow live music at restaurants in the South Main Preservation District.

Brides and grooms who'd like to get married at the  in St. Charles often change their minds after learning they won't be able to have live music at the reception. 

David Campbell, owner of the winery, said he's lost hundreds of weddings because of a long-standing city zoning code which prohibits live music at restaurants, cafés and cafeterias located in the South Main Preservation District.

David and his wife, Tammy Campbell, have petitioned to have the zoning law changed to allow restaurants and cafés to provide live music if they obtain a conditional use permit. The Campbells have owned the Little Hills Winery for the past 15 years.

“Equally as long as we’ve had the restaurant we’ve wondered why we are the only winery in the state that’s not allowed to have live music,” David Campbell said at the Planning and Zoning meeting Aug. 27. 

The Little Hills Winery and Restaurant is one of nine restaurants in the South Main Preservation Society District that is not permitted to have live music. 

The Planning and Zoning Commission voted 5-2 against the zoning change. The St. Charles City Council held a public hearing on the matter Tuesday, but sponsor Coucilwoman Mary Ann Ohms opted to wait to introduce the bill before the council. She said she'd like to see the proposal amended to allow live music indoors only at restaurants. 

"I want a compromise position if we can reach it," she said. "I'm going to try to get the best bill possible."

The Campbells said they understand that the winery is located in an area which also has residents, which is why they recommend imposing restrictions that music must end by 8 p.m. Sundays, 9 p.m. Monday-Thursday and 10 p.m. Saturdays and Sundays. 

Several area business owners spoke out against the proposed change, saying it would have a negative impact on the residents who live on South Main and on South Second Street. 

“Music is not the issue. The combination of music and alcohol is the issue,” said Holly Haddox, owner of The Conservatory, during a planning and zoning meeting. “Regardless of your intentions we know that over time conditions are relaxed. We know enforcement is impossible. We know some who sell alcohol will always push to the edges.” 

Residents who live on Main Street and Second Street expressed concerns that allowing music would lead to more . 

Former city council member and current Planning and Zoning member Larry Muench tried to come up with a solution that would work for everyone in 2010. After four months of work, he pulled a proposal from consideration, which would have allowed unamplified music. 

Councilman Dave Beckering said he's heard various discussions about the difficulty of enforcement by monitoring decibel levels. "We don't have the means or funding to send police officers out to monitor decibel levels," he said.  

Tammy Campbell September 06, 2012 at 11:11 PM
Ok Katie I would be delighted to have you for lunch. When are you available? It appears you have many concerns I would love to address face to face, I'll buy.
Carl Fontiac September 07, 2012 at 01:54 AM
I would also add that an incident at the winery is part of the reason that live music was banned.
Dino McDonnell September 12, 2012 at 05:33 PM
You need to put yourself in the shoes of those who live around south main, the extra traffic, the car break-in and other petty crime. This is their home and they have a right to keep out as much problems as they can. It just might be that south main is not a good place for late night food establishments. South Main is not an entertainment district but an historic district. Let’s not forget that the city also sponsors music on main during the summer. Most of the music on north main does not even start until after 9 PM. The competition is also getting steep with other venues like the Wine Bar and Padavan’s in Newtown which all have music several evenings a month. It is survival of the fittest folks, and if you have a restaurant that’s business plan does not work in its current location, then it time to move.
Josephine Roberts September 13, 2012 at 06:21 PM
This is an atrocious response, not only has this been said by the common public, it was stated by a councilman, Seventy five percent of people purchasing commerical property for economic growth will seek some modification to zoning laws to accomplish their business objectives. The fallacy of your arguement assumes, NOTHING EVER CHANGES, AND NO ONE WANTS CHANGE!!! The owners of McDonald's on Fifth Street purchased the building Years ago before the revolution of "drive-up" windows or the proper zoning term is "in-car food service", without a change in the zoning ordinance, allowing the conditional use of "in-car food service," there would be no drive thru. So this response is un-educated.
Josephine Roberts September 13, 2012 at 06:24 PM
That is a very interesting fact, would love for you to provide evidence of this? From researching on my own, seems like the ordinance was put in place in 1970, The original owners of the Winery of the Little Hills, incorporated and produced wine in 1978.....those dated dont support your comment


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »